Cancerfacts.com: Training more important than volume for mammograms
Cancerfacts.com: Training more important than volume for mammograms"After controlling for other variables, the authors found that neither current reading volume (the number of mammograms read the year before the study) nor the number of years of reading mammograms were associated with accuracy. However, radiologists trained more recently interpreted screening mammograms more accurately than radiologists trained earlier."
Permalink | Thursday, February 20, 2003
Page 1 of 1 pages